Sunday, May 15, 2011
Drone Technology employed on 9/11 Aircraft; no Muslims involved - It was an Inside Job!
May 9, 2011
9/11: Was it Osama and his Cavemen or QRS-11 Microchip-Equipped ‘Droned’ Aircraft?
The lips of the ‘ghosts of bin Laden’ are still moving
As much of the world applauds President Obama for his courageous decision to unilaterally abrogate the sovereignty of Pakistan through the daring U.S. Navy Seal commando raid at Abbotabad, Pakistan, many are questioning the validity of the ‘evidence’ offered in proving the assassination of Osama bin Laden. Perhaps the critical issue that global journalist should really be focused on is whether or not bin Laden was truly responsible for the events of 9/11, the pretext for the original invasion of Afghanistan and launch of the global war on terror.
Reflecting back on the weak evidence offered and bizarre conclusions drawn in the 9/11 Commission final report, we are being asked yet another time to accept frail evidence as statement of facts from this same government. If Osama did not plan and execute the events of 9/11, perhaps his extrajudicial murder will explain the U.S. desire to assassinate him and dump his body in the ocean. The corpses of many mob informants wishing to testify before a grand jury lie beneath the East River in New York and the Chicago River before ever being given the chance to take the witness stand.
Just weeks prior to the illegal incursion of Pakistan airspace, in a peculiarly timely manner, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced to the world that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad would be tried by a highly-secretive military tribunal at Guantanamo Bay vice a public jury trial in the United States. Having been illegally water boarded 198 times to extract his testimony that he, and not bin Laden, was responsible for the planning and execution of 9/11, we might surmise that even President Obama would testify that he was a legal citizen of Nigeria vice the United States if he were to endure similar illegal torture in direct violation of the Geneva accords.
98% of all U.S. whistleblowers suppressed in the past decade
This dismal failure rate coupled with observed harsh whistleblower retaliation sends a chilling signal down the spine of other would-be whistleblowers that consequently have remained silent. Many whistleblower victims are fighting back.
Considering the 9/11 Commission Report, it must be noted that with the exception of former FAA/TSA Red Team Leader Bogdan Dzakovic, one of the world’s foremost experts on aviation security, who provided 9/11 congressional testimony that was largely ignored in the final report before his retaliatory demotion at TSA, not one single airline pilot was permitted to provide testimony before the commission regarding the feasibility of the seemingly impossible aerial feats performed that fateful day by an alleged small group of Arab private pilots with minimal flying experience.
In a recent episode of former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura’s acclaimed ‘Conspiracy Theory’ program aired on TruTv, it was demonstrated in an aircraft simulator by veteran airline pilots with countless years and many flying hours of experience in numerous commercial jet aircraft, the physical impossibility of hand-flying the profile of the ‘aircraft’ that impacted the Navy Intelligence Center of the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Identical questions have been raised by many knowledgeable sources regarding this same issue and the WTC attacks, but have been suppressed by the U.S. media as merely ‘wild theories’ without basis of fact when quite the contrary is true.
One may ask at what point in time do these ‘theories’ become facts. The age-old scientific method relies on physical evidence and statistical data proof to establish and accept a theory as fact. In the case of 9/11 all conclusions drawn from all available evidence points to the same fact: 9/11 was an inside job and, with the exception of a few patsies, no Muslims were involved in the planning or execution of that mission…not even Osama bin Laden…in spite of alleged CIA-planted evidence at the crime scenes.
Given that 9/11 was the most horrific crime ever committed on U.S. soil, it seems bizarre that not one molecule of forensic evidence was ever analyzed of the World Trade Center debris before being hauled off and buried in the Fresh Kills Land Fill on Staten Island and elsewhere around the world. And why didn’t Osama’s name ever appear on the FBI’s Most Wanted list?
FBI Director Robert Mueller and others in government have intimated in past public remarks that U.S. whistleblowers are ‘traitors’ for compromising the national security of the United States with their whistleblower disclosures of sensitive information that places citizens and soldiers in harm’s way. Given the solid evidence and facts at hand, perhaps the real traitors to the United States and the global community lies within the confines of the DC beltway, the ‘City of London’, and elsewhere in Europe and the Middle East.
All rational thinking human beings must therefore ask ‘Did Osama and his cave dwellers in fact plan 9/11 from the mountainous regions of Afghanistan or was it a complex and deceitful ‘inside job’ perpetrated by global criminals? The resulting pretext for the illegal invasion of Afghanistan in search of bin Laden and the pretext for the subsequent ‘Shock and Awe’ illegal invasion of Iraq would then both involve abrogation of the sovereignty of foreign nations in violation of international law.
Once the latter is proven to be true, and it will, then those guilty and complicit individuals from various countries must stand trial for heinous crimes against humanity in violation of international law as traitors against the United States and humankind in general.
As exemplified with the phenomenally accurate drone strikes in the northern regions of Pakistan and more recently in Libya and Yemen, the U.S., as the world’s only superpower, holds the military monopoly in the mastery of drone technology for pilotless attack aircraft. Recent revelations by an international grassroots group called ‘ABEL DANGER’ headed by former Northwest Airlines Captain and distinguished military veteran Field McConnell and his team have provided critical answers to 9/11 with the QRS-11 microprocessor, a computer chip installed on aircraft autopilot systems resulting in an uninterruptible autopilot transforming any aircraft into a remotely-controlled “drone”.
On September 11, 2001, Captain McConnell’s F-16 unit stationed out of Fargo, North Dakota stood the ‘ready alert’ NORAD watch at Langley AFB just south of Washington, DC. Two of his squadron mates had been launched that day in pursuit of an airborne target inbound to Washington, DC, but were vectored due east over the Atlantic Ocean even though the inbound hostile target had been acquired on Air Traffic Control and AWACS aircraft radar.
Meanwhile, in the rear seat of another dual seat F-16, already airborne from the same Fargo North Dakota Air National Guard squadron, sat the New York State Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and this before any aircraft had struck any targets that day. Concurrently, a FEMA AWACS aircraft orbited overhead New England as a supposed participant in a joint military exercise.
In 1999, President Bill Clinton had transferred the military AWACS aircraft from the U.S. Air Force inventory to FEMA. This same pilotless technology was available on September 11, 2001 and in 2006, the Boeing Aircraft Corporation quietly settled a suit with a $615-million settlement with the Department of Justice for integrating this technology into the autopilot systems of their aircraft.
Supporting evidence of secretly obtained of copied encrypted Nextel text messages emanating on 9/11 from the City of London to the city of Chicago and NASA further strengthen allegations of collusion, deceit, and traitorous deeds by numerous agencies and governments.
QRS-11 Microchip Is Installed on Boeing Aircraft Autopilot
During the early 1980s, Captain McConnell’s sister, Kristine Marcy, holding a very senior position in the Clinton Justice Department, helped create an internal agency known as the Senior Executive Service (SES). During this time frame, facing the threat of aircraft hijackings, the Department of Justice was challenged with the potential of an aircraft carrying high-threat federal prisoners from the state of Hawaii to the U.S. mainland for incarceration and future trial of being hijacked by prisoners, as the state of Hawaii had no federal detention facilities for this purpose.
Having many years of experience as a distinguished and decorated U.S. Air Force F-4 pilot, Captain McConnell had assisted in the earlier development of droning mothballed military aircraft for airborne fighter pilot target practice on these ‘droned’ pilotless aircraft targets. In response to his sister’s innocent query, Captain McConnell suggested the ‘droning’ of these prisoner-carrying aircraft that, if hijacked, would be guided by external sources without pilot control as the cockpit was secured and the hijacked aircraft safely guided to a secure location for landing.
Out of this suggestion and offer of associated technology specifications, the famed ConAir, portrayed in a Hollywood movie of the same name, was created. At the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton served as a patent attorney at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Another global grassroots organization, the ‘Whistleblowing Airline Employees Association’, whose mission is in full support of the Departments of Transportation and Homeland Security in making the U.S. airspace ‘the safest, most efficient airspace system in the world’, further supports suppressed aviation whistleblowers in providing information and direction to appropriate organizations, including government and whistleblower agencies and news services.
A radio interview including Captain McConnell’s first-hand account may be heard on the ‘Whistleblowing Airline Employees Blog Talk Radio Program’.
With 98% suppression of U.S. federal whistleblowers the past decade of which most were Transportation Security Administration (TSA) whistleblowers, President Obama is still promising a ‘greater openness of government’ with ‘enhanced protection of federal whistleblowers’ and encouraging the global community to give praise to the demise of Osama as the purported perpetrator of 9/11 with minimal evidence while also condemning Pakistan for alleged harboring the most wanted criminal.
In all fairness to the global citizenry, would it not now be the most opportune time to permit those individuals and organizations with proof to the contrary to step forward to refute the judgment that condemned Osama bin Laden to an extrajudicial murder to silence him forever without trial? In the U.S. judicial system, an individual is innocent until proven guilty in a trial that produces evidence and witness testimony to condemn him to prison or death.
The United States population of 300-million comprises but 5% of the global population of 6-billion. There are roughly 1-billion Muslims in the world whose global image has been tarnished by the Bush label of the ‘Islamofascist’ associated with Osama bin Laden.
Why must 95% of the world population allow a miniscule percentage of the 5% of U.S. citizenry to destroy the lives of so many foreigners while ethnocentrically demanding that all nations embrace western values and the rights to freedom of speech in exposing corruption such as that of 40-year U.S. friend Hosni Mubarak and others when it doesn’t exist 98% of the time in America for honest federal whistleblowers attempting to achieve identical goals?
The U.S. Navy Seal Team may have forever sealed the lips of a potential ‘whistleblower informant’ who knew too much, but wasn’t allowed to testify in a court of law. There are many ‘ghosts of bin Laden’ surviving his death who also know the truth concerning 9/11 whose lips are still moving.
Do we continue to allow the sentencing and condemnation of a man to death without a jury trial on the words and judgment of a few Washington DC politicians whose verdict in 2001 condemned to death over 30,000 Pakistanis at a cost in billions to an already impoverished nation during their supposed ‘war on terror’?
On behalf of Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Senator Joe Lieberman, Senator John McCain recently introduced a bill entitled the “Enemy Billigerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010” that potentially places every American citizen in danger of becoming an ‘enemy of the state’. Does this typify the ‘greater openness of government’ that President Obama has promised us? If so, then perhaps like the U.S.A. Patriot Act, its passage will zoom through congress to the president’s desk for signing in the aftermath of another ‘9/11-type false flag’ event inside the United States such as we saw that 2009 Christmas Day on Northwest 253 or elsewhere that may well be blamed on other ‘Islamofascists’ of the Bush era.
We must each ask ourselves who the real terrorist in the world are these days as similar ‘terrorist drone strikes’ that murdered 3,000 U.S. citizens on 9/11 continue to rain down terror on Pakistan, Libya, and Yemen causing unnecessary death and destruction while violating the national sovereignty of foreign nations without warrant under the guise of NATO human rights abuse violations and in the name of in suppressing international terrorism.
Perhaps the Arab League of Nations, a unified Muslim League, or the good citizens of Pakistan that have paid a very high price for the supposed ‘war on terror’ should consider reconvening their own ‘9/11 Commission’ so that those truly responsible for heinous crimes can be brought to justice through available evidence provided by global whistleblower organizations and individuals who have fled to foreign countries for physical protection through diplomatic asylum. To be certain, the United Nations will not revisit these issues, nor will the U.S. government and many of its ill-informed citizens.
This press release has been disseminated to major media outlets across North Africa and Southern Asia, as well as to other interested and concerned agencies across the European Union and beyond.